Thursday, August 15, 2013

THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS

 

The Pursuit of Happiness 


"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. " 



There are those who believe these words found within the Bill of Rights are going to save our nation. I have heard often, of late, that the founding documents of America are "sacred." In fact, I have always heard that these sacred rights are given to us by God. And we deduce from this that God is supportive of Lady Liberty and wants every nation to have the right to pursue happiness.


Now a very pointed question: Is it true that God desires us to pursue happiness? 

"Of course", many of you reply, "God wants us to be happy!"

Before we get any further into this, we need to be very clear about the meaning of happiness, the working definition for this post. 


What is Happiness? 


What is happiness? There are many ways to describe the feelings of happiness: satisfaction at having ones desires fulfilled, pleasure, contentment, comfort, pleasantness. There are ways of achieving these feelings of happiness. One is through passive pleasure where someone else gives you enjoyment without your asking for it--like a baby being rocked or someone giving you a gift. When someone begins to rely on this type of happiness, they develop the attitude that in life everything will be alright, it's in God's hands. They believe they have no control and learn to be satisfied, so they sit back and watch the show of life. 

There is also the active pursuit of happiness (reflected in the Bill of Rights). This is something you choose to do with your will, like going to the theater or ball game or grabbing a bag of Cheetos. When this philosophy is adopted you live a life seizing the moment, just "doing it." You prefer a God-helps-those-who-help-themselves attitude. This active pursuit of comfort, satisfaction and pleasure is definition we will be using here. 

How Do We Pursue Happiness?


Even the ancient philosophers saw this pursuit as tricky at best and impossible at worst. In Ethics II, Aristotle is a bit at odds with our current cultural definition as he argues that happiness is not  passive sensual pleasure, but an intellectual delight where one consciously wills to act in harmony with virtue. And one's act of virtue
must be done at the right time, in the right way with the right motive. And though rare, happiness can only be attained if ethical practices shape the events in the world. 

I am inclined to think that America's Englightenment-based founding fathers saw our country's pursuit of happiness with the pagan Aristotelian vision. America filled with ethical people  acting ethically in the quest to achieve our ethical goals. That would be far more realistic than today's vision of happiness. Culturally our happiness goals seem to be fame and fortune at any cost by as little effort as possible. Happiness is almost expected, even demanded as a right, because you are an American. Like a fast , inexpensive happiness drive-thru, "and supersize it." 

Today the effort in pursuing happiness falls on the "right" to pursuit it rather than on the actual pursuit. We tend to be passive our American goals. What I mean is that we often are lazy in education and in our lifestyles and morals. We want to sit back and be entertained instead of working hard to get to our dreams. And then we tend to be angry when we don't achieve our desires and blame someone else. 


When enough of us seem frustrated and depressed, some people become activists. These social reformers do not teaching people to become more hard working and self-reliant in attaining their goals, but they see the problem as the human right (to pursue happiness) as being inaccessible. They may see race or gender or sexual orientation or socio-economic status as impeding their right to pursue their dreams.  Rather than blame themselves, they blame the government, laws or the rich. The United States has become a culture of defending rights rather than using them. 

Does God Really Want Us to Pursue Happiness?


An even more basic question is if God even wants us to pursue happiness. I can hear everyone out there telling me, "Of course God wants us to be happy!" But that isn't what I am asking. Yes, God wants us happy, but are we supposed to be pursuing happiness? Even the ancient pagans figured out that you cannot achieve happiness when you are pursuing it. I cannot find anywhere in scripture that tell Christians to seek happiness. Quite the opposite, Jesus is recorded as saying we are to deny self and take up our cross and follow Him. We are to seek the kingdom of Heaven first and all the rest will be added. We are to sacrifice for others and seek the best for them, not ourselves. 

This idea of God-given right to pursue happiness is man's tradition, not one we derive from scripture.  

Think about it logically. No one really knows what makes them happy unless happiness consists only of a moment by moment self-gratification. It takes maturity to know what makes us happy. A child may think happiness is a dinner of sweets, but that will later make them sick. A thirteen-year-old may believe that pursuing happiness is getting one's own place, having a car and job but in reality that would be hell. An adult may want money or fame, but how many rich and famous people commit suicide? I don't know many hollywood stars I would want to change places with. Money and fame often make  one miserable. Jesus frequently warned us against pursuing money. Most of us are simply not wise enough to know what makes us happy therefore we are chasing shadows. We spend our life making poor choices in hopes of this elusive happiness, refusing to believe that the hard decisions, the  giving up ephemeral pleasures to seek the good of others will eventually bring us happiness. 

How many people divorce to pursue happiness and find that it hurt their children? How many father's pursued a career and placed his family at risk? God knew that we wouldn't be mature enough to know what it was that would make us truly happy or even how to get there without obedience to Him.

Using the Pursuit of Happiness to Pursue Evil




The worst of it is that we often use the freedom to pursue happiness as carte blanche to do evil. As if "I did it my way!" is  a religious theme-song for Americans.

Under the guise of God-given sacred rights we actually think we are doing right by doing what we wish. We incoherently place the white hat on ourselves and our goals when in reality we are going against God by certain choices. No one really thinks they are pursuing evil when they are sincere of heart. No one thinks of themselves as wearing the black hat and twisting one's mustache when one is simply doing what the Constitution tells us what God wants us to do. No way! Americans always wear the white hat, don't we? 

But doing wrong under the guise of seeking our happiness shows  we do not have God's mind. We'll never be  smart enough to know the end from the beginning. 

We think that our interpretation of what is good and evil is a God-given right. Upon the bases of our personal ideas of right and wrong, we pursue the goals we think will make us happy and we hear the Stars Spangled Banner in the background see Old Betsy proudly waving and think we are pleasing God. Wrong.

There are Christians out there who truly believe that Christ died for our rights to choose evil--that the Cross was about freedom to do what we want without consequences. (Actually, God's creatures have always had choice. The angels fell because of their choice.) The Cross was about restoration! Salvation was about giving us the opportunity to choose God and to turn from enslaving sin. God isn't about freedom of choice but about our willful choice of choosing obedience of faith to Him!

American Christians are brilliant at excusing our wicked choices with the Bill of Rights. It's as if we have more faith in the Constitution than scripture, more faith in the founding fathers than Christ.



Happiness is Obeying God's Will, Not Ours



The pursuit of happiness can be an utterly self-consumed and selfish way to live. Happiness is not the goal for Christians, holiness is. We should live a life so filled with Christ, a soul so full of truth and goodness, that others will see our love and will be drawn to that light. We will save our nation and others not by our pursuit of happiness but by a life teaming with humble self-sacrifice, a life full of faithful obedience working through love. 



Rights are killing our happiness. Doing what God tells us is right is our only hope of happiness.






3 comments:

Arik said...

The constitution is a secular document based on two great Christian ideas. The separation of church and state, and the freedom to worship God according to the dictates of our conscience. This philosophy is the only way faith can thrive and grow.

With these freedoms come also the right to choose to do evil, and the devil has made it very easy in this country to do so. But the fault does not lie in the right to choose or the freedoms in this country that protect that right. God never commissioned the government, media, or the entertainment industry to preach the Gospel. This is the job of the church. It is the church's resposibility to show the world that true happiness comes from serving God. And when the church has failed to do this, we as Christians should not blame the state, or the constitution, or the media, or the rights and freedoms of this country. We only have ourselves to blame in not showing the world that happiness and holiness are one and the same.





Teresa Beem said...

Arik, you are simply restating the point of the post.

Except that these "two great ideas" of the separation of church and state and freedom are not Biblical. They are enlightenment philosophy. I am not saying they are wrong, but I am saying they are not found in scripture. The point of the post was to explain that the government is not Christian-based nor ever was. It is Christians who confuse the two and believe we have been and are Bible-based. God does not call us to freedom, He calls us to holiness. Don't confuse the two. The government certainly CAN choose to implement freedom for all its citizens and separate itself from the church, but we need to be very careful calling the government philosophies Christian. They may have been written up by Christians wanting to try out enlightenment philosophies, but even that is not fully certain. Most of the contributors to the Constitution were enlightenment thinkers even while believing in God.

So, perhaps I am mistaking your comment, it seems as if it is written to contradict my post, but it is supporting it. Are you agreeing with me?

Arik said...

Hi Teresa,

I wasn't writing because I disagreed with you per se, I was just adding my two cents. However I do not think that "rights are killing our hapiness" but rather it's our choices, which our rights protect.

I actually disagree more with your latest comment than I do the article. The separation of church and state is indeed Biblical as well as freedom to choose for ourselves what we consider hapiness. Even if the choice is wrong, it is not the states resposibility to define happiness in out persuits.

It is true God calls us to holiness, but true holiness which requires faith can only happen in a free environment. Anything less than free is coercion, and that was never God's way.

I agree the government is NOT Christian based, nor should it be, that is the directive of the Church. Even in the times of Israel God maintained a separation of civil and religious authorities-priests and judges played separate roles.

The fact that America is declining in morals is not the fault of the state or the freedoms it protects but rather the church's fault for preaching a watered down Gospel, God's law has been nailed to the cross, once saved always saved, etc. A church that reaches out to the civil power to coerce "dissenters" to accept its teachings apparently thinks the power of the Gospel is inadequate to persuade and save. I would think the Catholic Church would know this best.